<link rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5CBRYCER%7E1%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w
unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> Some how we need to figure out the top echelon of cappers, based on multiple people’s experience, and proven track records. I say multiple because any one person can say someone sucks or is good. And I have seen it many of times where people just don’t know what they are talking about because maybe someone decided to follow a capper that had a bad week so they get pissed off… (ie just this last week someone say ATS sucked however they have then at 42-21 +53 in NCAA and 15-16 +11 in NFL, and financial 10-8 +12units).
Which leads me to my next point, some cappers are better at one sport, college, or pros. And after 2 months of flowing tons of cappers I have a pretty good idea but would love feed back and input.
The main problem I have is that some cappers picks have been available consistently and others have been very sporadic. In addition what is really annoying are all the random cappers that get posted. I mean its ridiculous!!! I will see picks from a capper one week and maybe never see them again or see them a month down the road. Like Charlie who lit it up for the first few weeks and then kind of crashed and was never to be seen on the forum again. And I know they way in on the decisions of what some people take even though they are a completely random capper.
So I guess the point I am trying to make is. Instead of going out and buying random cappers picks. Stop being sold on these guys or being afraid you are going to miss the hot streak of a capper. Lets just focus out cash and invest into proven winners and from there we can all make our own consensus picks and win!
I hope this makes sense?!?! The following is a list of the cappers that I feel are worthy and also the ones you don’t need to bother wasting your time with. The stats do not include this weekend!!! Some I feel I have gotten a majority if not all of their plays and others only some. So feel free to weigh in on the list or add to it. We may not get this done this year. But lets work towards the future!!!
<o
> </o
>
YES
3G Sports – fairly consistent on getting their picks
NCAA 17-10 +38
NFL 7-4 +30
<o
> </o
>
Allen Eastman – his first 2 weeks I have a different ranking system for his plays… based on 1-7* and not $
NCAA 8-8 +1991
NFL 23-14 +2055
<o
> </o
>
Anthony Redd – good in NCAA
28-18 +150
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Apache – missing 2 weeks fo NFL plays from him
NFL 17-10 +169
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
ATS Lock…mentioned above
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Blazer – missing 3 weeks of NCAA plays
NCAA 17-10 +6
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Black widow
NCAA 18-12 +17
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Bob Valentino – I like him because he is selective on his bests
NCAA 5-2 +195
NFL 3-2 +25
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Chris Jordon – good in NFL
8-5 +1000
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Destroy the Books – paretic plays
NCAA 8-0 +21
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Dominic Fazzini – sporadic
NCAA 6-1 +75
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Executive – my favorite
NCAA 29-11 +5050
NFL 11-7 +1250
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Frank patron – again selective on plays… I like!
NCAA 13-6 +100000
NFL 6-3 +50000
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Karl Garrett – missing is first 3 weeks
NCAA 12-7 +90
NFL 2-1 +90
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Kelso – good on his big plays… his is marginal record but positive units
NCAA 16-18 +269
NFL 10-5 +227
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
KBHoops
NCAA 23-15 +29
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
NSA – good in NCAA sucks in NFL
NCAA 19-5 +180
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
RAS – totals duh but not worth the $10000 I heard them talking about
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Seabass – NCAA but not NFL
NCAA 39-36 +1350
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Score – NFL
NFL 12-3 +3100
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
The Greatest – very sporadic
NCAA 6-1 +13
NFL 1-0 +3
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
NO – ie great fade material
<o
> </o
>
Cappers Access –
Ncaa 25-31
NFL 11-16
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Chris Jordon
NCAA 8-21 -900
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Igz1 Sports – sporadic and sucks
NCAA 4-12 -18
NFL 3-5 -4
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Street Rosenthal
18-28 -1200
NFL 5-7 -200
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
<o
> </o
>
Strike point picks
NFL 4-10 -20